19-03-2026, 04:51 PM
Quote:More than that: they are identical except for the number.Indeed...
Quote:I don't see how you can say that for #19. Maybe the pen can be said to be similar, but the ink has been so altered by erasure and chemicals that it is impossible to tell.You are right. We can say it for #4 only.
Quote:That is definitely not an "N" but an "H". Since the name is in Czech, the "H" must be an abbreviation of some Czech word. Do we have any Czech speakers in the audience?Indeed, we need a letter from Jacobus Sinapius to state on it.
Quote:Indeed it matches the signature "manu propria" shown in René's page, including the peculiar x-like "p".Indeed !
Quote:I think in the whole collection of Jacobus Sinapius, there was at least 2 or 3 ordered sub-collections and this should explain why the books noted in 1602 and the "Voynich collection" have unordered (between) them chronological numbers.
Quote:Allright, but there are other explanations...This theory of two different collections could explain why the #4 (dated after 1608) is written after the #7 or #18 (dated from 1602).
Could you please give us other explanations ? I'm very new on this research, thank you.
All the best, --stolfi
[/quote]