Observations on the Visual and Functional Structure of the Voynich Manuscript

[emanuele.pegorin]

I’m analyzing the plant text. What stands out is that the drawings were clearly made first, and the text was added afterward. Another thing I notice is that at the end of each description, there is a sort of space and a “name.” One word that appears on all the folios is otto ANI, which could mean “plant” in a generic sense. Then there could be the actual name of the plant, which I still find repeated within the text. Sometimes there are multiple “names,” and it seems that rather than the plant’s actual name, it’s more like a descriptive label, composed of one, two, or more terms. From this descriptive name, the actual description starts, following a sequence: first the first term, then the second, and so on. What do you think about this?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.