10-02-2026, 06:08 AM
According to my deductions, the so-called Rosettes page is composed of nine circles.
The central circle represents the main core: it can be interpreted as the kingdom, the district, or the primary city.
Around this central circle there are other circles placed above, below, left, and right. I do not interpret these as separate or purely symbolic places, but rather as sectional enlargements, meaning zoomed-in views taken from specific points of the same territory. It is as if the drawing shows: here is the center, and here are enlarged details of particular areas.
Inside at least two of these circles, symbols appear that are also found elsewhere in the manuscript, especially in what I interpret as circles related to specific roles and duties, which I have not yet discussed in detail. I am attaching images showing these “enlargements” and the similar recurring symbols that I observe in those role- or function-related circles.
What I consider important is that these circles are not isolated. The image clearly shows that they are connected by bridges and pathways, suggesting that they belong to a single urban or territorial system rather than to independent symbolic elements.
In one of these circles, a small castle is depicted at a reduced scale. In my view, this reduced size indicates that the drawing is not meant to represent the castle itself, but rather a specific section of the territory associated with it.
For these reasons, I interpret the nine circles not as abstract or disconnected symbols, but as a visual explanation of different sections, functions, and activities within the same community or kingdom, shown through a centric or radial perspective that is consistent with other parts of the manuscript.
This interpretation is, of course, open to debate, but it comes from an attempt to provide a continuous and coherent line of reasoning across the manuscript as a whole.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
The central circle represents the main core: it can be interpreted as the kingdom, the district, or the primary city.
Around this central circle there are other circles placed above, below, left, and right. I do not interpret these as separate or purely symbolic places, but rather as sectional enlargements, meaning zoomed-in views taken from specific points of the same territory. It is as if the drawing shows: here is the center, and here are enlarged details of particular areas.
Inside at least two of these circles, symbols appear that are also found elsewhere in the manuscript, especially in what I interpret as circles related to specific roles and duties, which I have not yet discussed in detail. I am attaching images showing these “enlargements” and the similar recurring symbols that I observe in those role- or function-related circles.
What I consider important is that these circles are not isolated. The image clearly shows that they are connected by bridges and pathways, suggesting that they belong to a single urban or territorial system rather than to independent symbolic elements.
In one of these circles, a small castle is depicted at a reduced scale. In my view, this reduced size indicates that the drawing is not meant to represent the castle itself, but rather a specific section of the territory associated with it.
For these reasons, I interpret the nine circles not as abstract or disconnected symbols, but as a visual explanation of different sections, functions, and activities within the same community or kingdom, shown through a centric or radial perspective that is consistent with other parts of the manuscript.
This interpretation is, of course, open to debate, but it comes from an attempt to provide a continuous and coherent line of reasoning across the manuscript as a whole.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.