09-02-2026, 08:33 PM
Dear Jiménez, thank you for your reply — and compliments on the name, at least in football terms ? (just joking, of course).
I am not contradicting the idea that it could represent the Holy Spirit, or any other symbolic or religious interpretation you believe in. That is entirely possible.
My deduction comes from the fact that I have tried to give the manuscript a logical reading from beginning to end. Following this internal coherence, I am led to interpret these elements as water flows.
Of course, it could also be the Holy Spirit, a dove, or an angel — that cannot be excluded. What I am proposing, however, is an interpretation that starts at the beginning of the manuscript and continues consistently to the end, creating a logical thread.
This interpretation could be wrong, it can certainly be challenged — and it probably will be — but my intention is to offer a coherent line of reasoning that connects the manuscript as a whole.
I am not contradicting the idea that it could represent the Holy Spirit, or any other symbolic or religious interpretation you believe in. That is entirely possible.
My deduction comes from the fact that I have tried to give the manuscript a logical reading from beginning to end. Following this internal coherence, I am led to interpret these elements as water flows.
Of course, it could also be the Holy Spirit, a dove, or an angel — that cannot be excluded. What I am proposing, however, is an interpretation that starts at the beginning of the manuscript and continues consistently to the end, creating a logical thread.
This interpretation could be wrong, it can certainly be challenged — and it probably will be — but my intention is to offer a coherent line of reasoning that connects the manuscript as a whole.