17-01-2026, 05:21 PM
[Is this the right thread for this post?]
Here are some statistics about gallows and parag head/body lines. I suppose that 65'534 people already computed and posted them, but maybe they will be new to some.
Let "puff" mean a one-leg gallows (p or f), and "tike" mean a two-leg one (t or k)
I took the parags text in each section ("hea", "heb", "cos", "zod", etc.), and split the lines into "head" (the first line) and "body" (all the other lines).
For each of these sets of lines I computed:
Here are the results:
body
-------------------------------------------------------------------
sec nl nlp %lp nlt %lt nc ncp %cp nct %ct %cg
--- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----
hea 1042 78 7.5 991 95.0 31256 99 0.3 2972 9.5 9.8
heb 322 58 18.0 320 99.3 14201 92 0.6 1548 10.9 11.5
bio 700 90 12.8 679 96.9 29464 144 0.5 2797 9.5 10.0
str 751 44 5.9 727 96.7 37085 59 0.2 3458 9.3 9.5
unk 272 61 22.4 267 98.1 13353 114 0.9 1297 9.7 10.6
pha 190 15 7.9 188 98.8 9520 35 0.4 792 8.3 8.7
cos 129 17 13.2 101 78.2 3758 19 0.5 320 8.5 9.0
head
-------------------------------------------------------------------
sec nl nlp %lp nlt %lt nc ncp %cp nct %ct %cg
--- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----
hea 167 129 77.2 153 91.5 6307 289 4.6 391 6.2 10.8
heb 51 47 92.0 49 96.0 2577 143 5.5 158 6.1 11.7
bio 40 32 79.9 40 99.9 1757 73 4.2 160 9.1 13.2
str 331 258 77.9 331 99.9 19671 621 3.2 1816 9.2 12.4
cos 45 24 53.3 38 84.3 1357 37 2.7 98 7.2 9.9
pha 33 27 81.7 32 96.8 1850 62 3.3 127 6.9 10.2
unk 33 32 96.8 30 90.8 1726 112 6.5 91 5.3 11.7
Some things worth noting, considering the major sections ("hea", "heb", "bio", "str"):
If we assume that the tikes have phonetic value, and that the sounds they represent have the same frequencies in both sets (an assumption that is weakly supported by the similar %ct across sections), the last observation could be explained by assuming that most of the puffs on head lines are embellished versions of the tikes (or of tikes combined with other glyphs, like te or ke), while a few puffs are substituting for other characters.
However, word frequencies are probably different on head lines, and thus the frequency of sounds may well be different too. Thus the above conclusion should be taken with a ladle of salt...
All the best, --stolfi
Here are some statistics about gallows and parag head/body lines. I suppose that 65'534 people already computed and posted them, but maybe they will be new to some.
Let "puff" mean a one-leg gallows (p or f), and "tike" mean a two-leg one (t or k)
I took the parags text in each section ("hea", "heb", "cos", "zod", etc.), and split the lines into "head" (the first line) and "body" (all the other lines).
For each of these sets of lines I computed:
- nl = count lines in the set.
- nlp = count of those lines that contain puffs
- %lp = percentage of nlp relative to nl
- nlt = count of lines that contain tikes
- %lt = percentage of nlt relative to nl.
- nc = total count of EVA characters [a-z] in that set
- ncp = count of puffs among those chars
- %cp = percentage of ncp relative to nc
- nct = count of tikes among those chars
- %ct = percentage of nct relative to nc
- %cg = percentage of ncp+nct (total gallows) relative to nc.
Here are the results:
body
-------------------------------------------------------------------
sec nl nlp %lp nlt %lt nc ncp %cp nct %ct %cg
--- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----
hea 1042 78 7.5 991 95.0 31256 99 0.3 2972 9.5 9.8
heb 322 58 18.0 320 99.3 14201 92 0.6 1548 10.9 11.5
bio 700 90 12.8 679 96.9 29464 144 0.5 2797 9.5 10.0
str 751 44 5.9 727 96.7 37085 59 0.2 3458 9.3 9.5
unk 272 61 22.4 267 98.1 13353 114 0.9 1297 9.7 10.6
pha 190 15 7.9 188 98.8 9520 35 0.4 792 8.3 8.7
cos 129 17 13.2 101 78.2 3758 19 0.5 320 8.5 9.0
head
-------------------------------------------------------------------
sec nl nlp %lp nlt %lt nc ncp %cp nct %ct %cg
--- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----- ----- ---- ----- ---- ----
hea 167 129 77.2 153 91.5 6307 289 4.6 391 6.2 10.8
heb 51 47 92.0 49 96.0 2577 143 5.5 158 6.1 11.7
bio 40 32 79.9 40 99.9 1757 73 4.2 160 9.1 13.2
str 331 258 77.9 331 99.9 19671 621 3.2 1816 9.2 12.4
cos 45 24 53.3 38 84.3 1357 37 2.7 98 7.2 9.9
pha 33 27 81.7 32 96.8 1850 62 3.3 127 6.9 10.2
unk 33 32 96.8 30 90.8 1726 112 6.5 91 5.3 11.7
Some things worth noting, considering the major sections ("hea", "heb", "bio", "str"):
- Less than 20% of body lines have puffs, whereas more than 77% of head lines have them. Therefore puffs are not exclusive to head lines, but are much more common in them.
- The percentage of puffs relative to all EVA chars (%cp) is ~3.5% higher on head lines than on body lines, while the percentage of tikes (%ct) is ~3.0% lower.
If we assume that the tikes have phonetic value, and that the sounds they represent have the same frequencies in both sets (an assumption that is weakly supported by the similar %ct across sections), the last observation could be explained by assuming that most of the puffs on head lines are embellished versions of the tikes (or of tikes combined with other glyphs, like te or ke), while a few puffs are substituting for other characters.
However, word frequencies are probably different on head lines, and thus the frequency of sounds may well be different too. Thus the above conclusion should be taken with a ladle of salt...
All the best, --stolfi


