In Support of Guido Pérez's Suggestion

[nablator]

I'm kinda torn on whether it reveals anything new or not, but 

Hopefully guidoperez will try again.

I wanted to give guidoperez the benefit of the doubt. Now after checking a few things, I doubt there is anything salvageable in there. It's all either miscalculated or AI-hallucinated.

I checked the "J" statistics of the VMS, inter-paragraph consecutive lines Jaccard index of word similarity, keeping all spaces ('.' and ','), lines extracted from RF1b-er, paragraph starts-ends from ZL3a.

Global (all paragraphs): 0.032
Q13: 0.051
Q20: 0.029

Q13 is more repetitive, no surprise, we knew that from MATTR statistics.

Note: the C lines in the old interlinear file are missing a lot of pages, there is only one page of Q20 (f106v) so I used the complete RF basic EVA transliteration instead.

There is no baseline value of Latin herbals, higher or lower than that: both are possible, I checked. It depends: some medieval texts use "ad" a lot, and other NLP "stop words" like "et", "vel", others not so much.

The VMS doesn't have a short list of extremely common "stop words" that appear in almost every line, this is certainly true and it is the only fact worth discussing.