First of all, thank you for your reply. This forumต is genuinely impressive. Discussions here are consistently detailed, careful, and serious, which is truly admirable.
The text I have identified is not just another manuscript from the same period. I have several concrete reasons to believe that it was written by the same hand.
Because the Voynich text uses its own autonomous writing system and does not directly reproduce Latin letters, direct comparison is inherently difficult. For this reason, I believe the partially Latin colophon on the final page is a far more suitable basis for paleographic comparison.
I think it would be highly valuable for a specialist to compare the texts I have found, since any meaningful match could help resolve a number of long-standing uncertainties.
The text I have identified is not just another manuscript from the same period. I have several concrete reasons to believe that it was written by the same hand.
Because the Voynich text uses its own autonomous writing system and does not directly reproduce Latin letters, direct comparison is inherently difficult. For this reason, I believe the partially Latin colophon on the final page is a far more suitable basis for paleographic comparison.
I think it would be highly valuable for a specialist to compare the texts I have found, since any meaningful match could help resolve a number of long-standing uncertainties.