"The Currier languages revisited" revisited
#31
I have quite a lot of data on this, which I have started to summarise, but this is still far from ready to publish. I can say with confidence that it is not a matter of spelling change. I am also reasonably sure that it can at some point be explained with a few 'rules'. But I haven't found them yet.

What it looks like most to me, is that all frequent A words continue to be used in B, but there is a whole set of new words. This causes a shift in frequencies of these frequent A words of course.
[+] 2 users say Thank You to ReneZ for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited - by ReneZ - 21-12-2025, 10:40 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Independent Analysis Identifying Languages Beyond Currier A/ B, compared to René Zand npcompl33t 18 2,655 12-10-2026, 04:10 PM
Last Post: npcompl33t
  Discussion of "The Voynich Manuscript: Symbol roles revisited" RenegadeHealer 7 11,515 31-01-2025, 10:54 PM
Last Post: bt2901
  Extension to the Currier languages ReneZ 19 16,324 15-05-2024, 10:02 PM
Last Post: Juan_Sali
  La Divina Commedia (revisited) dfs346 0 6,463 23-03-2024, 10:48 PM
Last Post: dfs346
  A research strategy (revisited) dfs346 1 4,201 14-02-2024, 10:23 PM
Last Post: Anton
  Do f58r/f58v show Currier languages evolving? nickpelling 14 14,522 29-12-2022, 01:26 PM
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus
  Time to retire Currier languages? Emma May Smith 42 38,421 20-08-2021, 12:38 AM
Last Post: cvetkakocj@rogers.com
  Implications of the continuity of Currier "languages" MarcoP 21 27,625 31-12-2018, 05:13 PM
Last Post: nickpelling

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)