"The Currier languages revisited" revisited
#23
This is consistent with my own results.

I wouldn't call this either A or B language.
Rather than using % of 'ed' bigrams, I did the analysis on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. using % of words including 'ed'.

The foremost distinction is the following: on Herbal A and Pharma pages this is <1%
On Herbal B, stars and Bio pages this ranges from 16% to 28%, leaving a big gap.

The remaining pages (astro/cosmo/zodiac) are in this gap, with the zodiac around 6%.
I have called this C language.
[+] 1 user says Thank You to ReneZ for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: "The Currier languages revisited" revisited - by ReneZ - 20-12-2025, 11:24 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Independent Analysis Identifying Languages Beyond Currier A/ B, compared to René Zand npcompl33t 18 2,655 12-10-2026, 04:10 PM
Last Post: npcompl33t
  Discussion of "The Voynich Manuscript: Symbol roles revisited" RenegadeHealer 7 11,515 31-01-2025, 10:54 PM
Last Post: bt2901
  Extension to the Currier languages ReneZ 19 16,324 15-05-2024, 10:02 PM
Last Post: Juan_Sali
  La Divina Commedia (revisited) dfs346 0 6,463 23-03-2024, 10:48 PM
Last Post: dfs346
  A research strategy (revisited) dfs346 1 4,201 14-02-2024, 10:23 PM
Last Post: Anton
  Do f58r/f58v show Currier languages evolving? nickpelling 14 14,522 29-12-2022, 01:26 PM
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus
  Time to retire Currier languages? Emma May Smith 42 38,421 20-08-2021, 12:38 AM
Last Post: cvetkakocj@rogers.com
  Implications of the continuity of Currier "languages" MarcoP 21 27,625 31-12-2018, 05:13 PM
Last Post: nickpelling

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)