08-12-2025, 12:04 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-12-2025, 12:52 AM by RobGea.
Edit Reason: text,clarity, pronoun
)
Hi Ruby Novacna,
The Naibbe cipher takes some Latin / Italian plaintext, that is, normal, readable, understandable text, and when put through the Naibbe cipher method, that normal plaintext is converted into an approximation of Voynichese.
There is nothing to decipher , unless you have some previously Naibbe enciphered text.
Hi Torsten,
are they your own thoughts ? you are supposed to acknowledge when you have you used AI you know
On the whole i agree with your post, though there are some nit-picking and hair-splitting arguments in there.
Hopefully, in the future, as magnesium notes, researchers can take the pros and cons of the Naibbe cipher and create a "Better…Stronger…Faster” version.
The Naibbe cipher has some issues, some acknowledged by magnesium and some pointed out by Torsten and
now that the Naibbe cipher is officially in the public domain it can function as a referenceable stepping stone for future research.
The Naibbe cipher takes some Latin / Italian plaintext, that is, normal, readable, understandable text, and when put through the Naibbe cipher method, that normal plaintext is converted into an approximation of Voynichese.
There is nothing to decipher , unless you have some previously Naibbe enciphered text.
Hi Torsten,
are they your own thoughts ? you are supposed to acknowledge when you have you used AI you know

On the whole i agree with your post, though there are some nit-picking and hair-splitting arguments in there.
Hopefully, in the future, as magnesium notes, researchers can take the pros and cons of the Naibbe cipher and create a "Better…Stronger…Faster” version.
The Naibbe cipher has some issues, some acknowledged by magnesium and some pointed out by Torsten and
now that the Naibbe cipher is officially in the public domain it can function as a referenceable stepping stone for future research.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)