02-12-2025, 02:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-12-2025, 02:58 PM by Mark Knowles.)
(02-12-2025, 11:50 AM)Rafal wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Something weird (or maybe not weird at all) is going at f70v2 (Pisces zodiac sign)
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
otar am otaral otalar otalam otolal
For me it is a very strong case for autocitation hypothesis suggested by Torsten Timm. The scribe is altering the same word and making a gibberish.
It such a case attempts to identify the star (like Alrescha from Pisces constellation) will be futile.
Would you have another explanations?
There are lots of strong cases for the autocitation hypothesis and I think many words were generated in that kind of way. However, from my perspective and where I think I differ from Torsten Timm's is that I don't think all words were or can be generated in such a way. To repeat my position, I think many null filler words were generated in such all way(though some were just produced from standard null word templates), but real words were not produced like this.
(02-12-2025, 12:43 PM)Rafal wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Ah, I missed it.
But how would you explain that otalam also seems to be a name of some plant root?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Does the supposed numeral also means carrot, parsley or horseradish?
I agree with you. The numeral theory could work in one or two cases, but overall the idea that these represent numerals doesn't seem to hold up. I conclude as I have in the past that some words must be null or meaningless.

