19-11-2025, 07:39 AM
(18-11-2025, 03:25 PM)Jorge_Stolfi wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.A short vertical stroke, down from the bottom of the second "L" of "allor".
So it could be a p, as I said. Thanks a lot, i didn't see this.
(18-11-2025, 03:25 PM)Jorge_Stolfi wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.A short curved left-pointing "tail" from near the bottom of the "L" of "lucz".
In any case, you can now see very clearly that it is an A in malher (m apiar) and that the stroke from the A leads to the next loop, which is exactly what the theory says, that it is an a with a "typical" upward loop (as in the examples I showed). and then u have Apiar'
I think that supports my thesis considerably...
but I'm not saying that it's Latin. I'm just saying that if it is Latin, then it's one of the most coherent translations to be found. And, I even dont know, if this was the true translation - we would need more information to know that. For example, what can possibly be seen under/ in the water stain on this side, the last two words.

