11-11-2025, 06:40 PM
@JoJo_Jost
No offense but your 'translation' requires the same mental gymnastics I have seen countless times over the years trying to make 'sense' of the marginalia. The problem is that there are countless other such 'translations' (in various proposed languages) that lead to completely different results. It's tiresome.
I propose we take a step back and try to make a map of possible glyphs of the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. marginalia. You know, positional variants for each glyph. What letters might there even be?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Is that word really 'oteeol' or 'oteeor'? I see 'ot'xxx'ol'
Are those voynich 'e's? And the way the second 'o' is connected to the adjacent letters is atypical for voynichese. We know from You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. that apparent single voynich glyphs may be inserted into seemingly latin words.
No offense but your 'translation' requires the same mental gymnastics I have seen countless times over the years trying to make 'sense' of the marginalia. The problem is that there are countless other such 'translations' (in various proposed languages) that lead to completely different results. It's tiresome.
I propose we take a step back and try to make a map of possible glyphs of the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. marginalia. You know, positional variants for each glyph. What letters might there even be?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Is that word really 'oteeol' or 'oteeor'? I see 'ot'xxx'ol'
Are those voynich 'e's? And the way the second 'o' is connected to the adjacent letters is atypical for voynichese. We know from You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. that apparent single voynich glyphs may be inserted into seemingly latin words.