06-11-2025, 01:19 PM
Hope you don't mind it going a tad off-topic, but to touch on what you and Jorge said, my previous work also found "ch" to be two parts.
If trying to map how the building blocks of glyphs interact with each other and which seem to be much less common or non-existent such as "yy", to use the topic of this thread, then I thought "ch" could not be a single curved glyph or two curved glyphs as it looks, but the line in-between (or connected to final part - h) may be its building block and the curve the modification, rather than the other way around. It seemed to me more like "ek" than "ee" for example.
Anyway, on topic. I think if you are looking at "y" as a suffix, there are interesting comparisons to be made between "iin" and "eeg", also "ain" and "edy", and some thoughts by others that maybe a transition from "ain" to "edy" is part of the "Language A" to "Language B" transition.
If trying to map how the building blocks of glyphs interact with each other and which seem to be much less common or non-existent such as "yy", to use the topic of this thread, then I thought "ch" could not be a single curved glyph or two curved glyphs as it looks, but the line in-between (or connected to final part - h) may be its building block and the curve the modification, rather than the other way around. It seemed to me more like "ek" than "ee" for example.
Anyway, on topic. I think if you are looking at "y" as a suffix, there are interesting comparisons to be made between "iin" and "eeg", also "ain" and "edy", and some thoughts by others that maybe a transition from "ain" to "edy" is part of the "Language A" to "Language B" transition.