06-11-2025, 12:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-11-2025, 12:55 PM by Bluetoes101.)
I think there are a few parts to it.
Are there ways in which it could be "normal"?
Yes, many noted here.
Are there ways in which it could be "normal" + context of images?
Yes, but it might be a bit more abstract, possible "filler" in places to keep structure - extended lines.
Can we see examples in other writings of people "being fancy" or adding abbreviations at the ends of lines to make glyphs that look like "m" etc?
Yes, It seems to be fairly common.
There's more, but overall it seems plausible beyond evidence of a coding system.
However, I think once you look at letter pairings and their frequency within lines, that's what makes me lean more into "evidence of a coding system" (Edit - Maybe, "evidence of purposeful structure to lines" is more accurate here) .
If that means "cipher" or something more mundane I don't know.
I don't think this can be by accident or unplanned.
Are there ways in which it could be "normal"?
Yes, many noted here.
Are there ways in which it could be "normal" + context of images?
Yes, but it might be a bit more abstract, possible "filler" in places to keep structure - extended lines.
Can we see examples in other writings of people "being fancy" or adding abbreviations at the ends of lines to make glyphs that look like "m" etc?
Yes, It seems to be fairly common.
There's more, but overall it seems plausible beyond evidence of a coding system.
However, I think once you look at letter pairings and their frequency within lines, that's what makes me lean more into "evidence of a coding system" (Edit - Maybe, "evidence of purposeful structure to lines" is more accurate here) .
If that means "cipher" or something more mundane I don't know.
I don't think this can be by accident or unplanned.
