The vowel exchange "a" to "o"

[Petrasti]

Why should I stick to a language for which there is no reference?
But I have references for German and a kind of Latin.
For example, why do I find German spelling in a Latin text? Even if you could say it's pure coincidence, is it really?
The ‘sz’ as a double ‘ss’ (Essig). Actually normal. The ending is normal, and it even has an article. What more could you want?
Think about it.

If you take a word that appears very rarely in the Voynich, you cannot make a reliable language comparison with it. Therefore, with imagination, it can mean anything. Let's take the example from above again: suppose I find the word "oeees" in the manuscript and find a matching word for it, e.g., in German or whatever, then the theory will soon be destroyed. Because I can prove to you based on the structure that the letter "o" (maybe an article) is a prefix that can be clearly recognized in the system through repetition. I think the system with the prefixes and also the a/y to o exchange should receive a certain amount of attention; therefore, with this thread, I wanted to ask the users to what extent the exchange is considered and to show that it should be taken into account in the translation.