09-10-2025, 01:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2025, 02:09 AM by Bluetoes101.)
A and B exist on a single page, separated by paragraph. I'd argue 2 connected pages.. but that's another thing.
It seems unlikely that someone would use a flawed cipher in conjunction with the new version on a page.
Imo, if it is a cipher, the cipher changed. Not it's use, understanding, words used, self citation, dialect or subject matter (being the things to blame).
Things that simply do not happen in A, happen in B. You can delete "edy" entirely and this is still true.. though I guess it more accurate to say doesn't happen for about 100 pages. It depends what you call A and B beyond ed/edy.
[edit] I guess, thinking about it, they changed it for some reason so it being faulty somehow is as good a reason as any. Q8 is the most interesting section for this "change", just a shame a bunch of it is missing... still seems odd to do a half and half page if you already considered your cipher faulty.
It seems unlikely that someone would use a flawed cipher in conjunction with the new version on a page.
Imo, if it is a cipher, the cipher changed. Not it's use, understanding, words used, self citation, dialect or subject matter (being the things to blame).
Things that simply do not happen in A, happen in B. You can delete "edy" entirely and this is still true.. though I guess it more accurate to say doesn't happen for about 100 pages. It depends what you call A and B beyond ed/edy.
[edit] I guess, thinking about it, they changed it for some reason so it being faulty somehow is as good a reason as any. Q8 is the most interesting section for this "change", just a shame a bunch of it is missing... still seems odd to do a half and half page if you already considered your cipher faulty.