Could synthetic “fake Voynich” tests tell us what we’re dealing with?

[oshfdk]

Or, now or in the future, we do generate thousands of fake texts reliably with the help of AI, the tests do work, and they do consistently and repeatably pin the VMS with high confidence to a particular universe of texts.

I'm not sure about others, but I will just dismiss this result as irrelevant without much thinking. Showing that the Voynich MS is similar to a particular set of texts doesn't prove that it belongs to that set. A snake is more similar to a garden hose than to a dog, but I doubt that it would be reasonable to treat a snake as garden inventory.