04-09-2025, 02:05 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-09-2025, 02:24 AM by anyasophira.)
(03-09-2025, 12:27 PM)pfeaster wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(02-09-2025, 03:22 AM)anyasophira wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Also, I suppose I should make a quick intro since this is my first real post. This is my first time having the nerve to speak up in my own post
Thanks for taking the plunge! These are interesting observations.
I'd add that the sequence on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. bears some resemblance to a peculiar structure of unusually common label "vords" that begin with [ot] or [ok] and have an [l] near or at the end: [otaly], [okal], [okaly], [okol], [otol], [otoly], [okaldy], [otaldy], [otoldy]. Those are some of the highest-frequency label vords that aren't particularly high-frequency vords in running text.
I've long suspected that these forms result when the same factors responsible for line patterning get applied to shorter snippets of text. What those factors are is, of course, another question! But maybe we're seeing something similar (and only slightly less extreme) on f65r.
Short lines at the ends of paragraphs could provide further material for comparison in the same spirit, although they're not quite as obviously self-standing as the text on f65r.
Thank you! I’m a huge fan of your work and I feel very honored you even glanced at this. would looking at those short lines at ends of paragraphs be a productive way to move forward ? How many words do you suppose might be a good start- 3 or 4? Maybe just begin by looking at how they trend and move. See if they behave any different than other lines or initial lines? Thank you again for your response.

