[split] The Zipf law and the Voynich Manuscript
#46
(17-08-2025, 01:22 PM)Antonio García Jiménez wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.But maybe there are no words at all, but each glyph is a concept, as Friedman thought. Then it would seem like meaningless text, but it would have meaning.

Hi, I am trying to understand what this could mean.
If each glyph a pictogram, aren't just too few "concepts" to encode any meaningful information?
Are there any existing examples of something like this?
Is there any evidence that there is no language? 

Regards,
G.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] The Zipf law and the Voynich Manuscript - by Gabriel L - 17-08-2025, 10:15 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Anton - 25-02-2017, 02:15 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Sam G - 25-02-2017, 02:50 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by -JKP- - 26-02-2017, 12:11 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 25-02-2017, 03:04 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Anton - 25-02-2017, 03:19 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by ReneZ - 25-02-2017, 04:11 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Sam G - 25-02-2017, 07:14 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 25-02-2017, 08:21 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by ReneZ - 26-02-2017, 08:48 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 26-02-2017, 11:20 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Sam G - 26-02-2017, 02:15 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 27-02-2017, 08:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)