[split] The Zipf law and the Voynich Manuscript
#38
Okay, Gabriel. I'll always trust someone with solid training in a subject more than what Artificial Intelligence tells me.

But you will understand that one is suspicious when Zipf's law says that the third most frequent word appears only a third as often as the first, and yet you see that instead of 288 the result is 501.

I guess you're right and in some way Zipf's law does apply, but I've read somewhere that this law is a case of the higher power law that occurs in many real-world phenomena.

In any case, I think there are enough reasons to suspect that the Voynich script is not linguistic.

Regards
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] The Zipf law and the Voynich Manuscript - by Antonio García Jiménez - 15-08-2025, 01:37 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Anton - 25-02-2017, 02:15 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Sam G - 25-02-2017, 02:50 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by -JKP- - 26-02-2017, 12:11 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 25-02-2017, 03:04 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Anton - 25-02-2017, 03:19 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by ReneZ - 25-02-2017, 04:11 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Sam G - 25-02-2017, 07:14 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 25-02-2017, 08:21 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by ReneZ - 26-02-2017, 08:48 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 26-02-2017, 11:20 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Sam G - 26-02-2017, 02:15 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 27-02-2017, 08:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)