[split] The Zipf law and the Voynich Manuscript
#31
I'm having a hard time interpreting the latest replies. The point of this thread is simple: it's about knowing whether the VM script reproduces a natural language and whether or not it therefore complies with Zipf's law.

The problem, as always, is that everything remains unresolved, and people will continue to say that the Voynich script follows Zipf's law when it is clear that it does not.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] The Zipf law and the Voynich Manuscript - by Antonio García Jiménez - 14-08-2025, 07:56 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Anton - 25-02-2017, 02:15 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Sam G - 25-02-2017, 02:50 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by -JKP- - 26-02-2017, 12:11 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 25-02-2017, 03:04 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Anton - 25-02-2017, 03:19 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by ReneZ - 25-02-2017, 04:11 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Sam G - 25-02-2017, 07:14 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 25-02-2017, 08:21 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by ReneZ - 26-02-2017, 08:48 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 26-02-2017, 11:20 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Sam G - 26-02-2017, 02:15 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 27-02-2017, 08:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)