[split] The Zipf law and the Voynich Manuscript
#26
I congratulate you on your varied linguistic knowledge, but we're talking about a document from medieval Europe, and it doesn't seem to make much sense to talk about other geographical environments.

You have not answered why in the SAME text the most frequent word is absent from some pages and what kind of grammatical element 'daiin' is.

I've already said that the data doesn't support the script following Zipf's law. The third most common word, 'chedy', appears 501 times, which is more than double the theoretical prediction. This isn't a small deviation, and the same goes for the fourth word.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] The Zipf law and the Voynich Manuscript - by Antonio García Jiménez - 14-08-2025, 09:47 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Anton - 25-02-2017, 02:15 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Sam G - 25-02-2017, 02:50 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by -JKP- - 26-02-2017, 12:11 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 25-02-2017, 03:04 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Anton - 25-02-2017, 03:19 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by ReneZ - 25-02-2017, 04:11 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Sam G - 25-02-2017, 07:14 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 25-02-2017, 08:21 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by ReneZ - 26-02-2017, 08:48 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 26-02-2017, 11:20 AM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Sam G - 26-02-2017, 02:15 PM
RE: Some letters aren't letters - by Torsten - 27-02-2017, 08:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)