Welcome to the forum.
I'll add you to our You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., but I'm not sure how to describe your language solution. It seems to draw on various unrelated language families. How would you describe it, given how the list is formatted?
AI has already delivered several wrong solutions of the VM for mutually incompatible languages - you can see a few on this list. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.explains why. You might want to check your work against what Koen wrote there, because all posts with "AI slop" are being moved into this thread.
In relation to the latter, it's not a good sign that your document says: "Using our grammar model, AI-generated Voynich-style sentences were produced and interpreted, such as:
By "Voynich-style", that sounds like you/Chat GPT mean Voynichese EVA? But while okal is recognizable EVA, "pamel" is not. This wouldn't be so much of a red flag except that your document then say pamel is used in folio 1r, 33v, 67r, and 88v. It's not. Has the AI hallucinated Voynichese text (yet again) and you didn't check it, or am I misunderstanding what you are doing here?
I fear I'm not misunderstanding, since your annex seems to mix real EVA words like shedy and daiin and qokain with "retchol", which I don't recognize.
I'll add you to our You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., but I'm not sure how to describe your language solution. It seems to draw on various unrelated language families. How would you describe it, given how the list is formatted?
AI has already delivered several wrong solutions of the VM for mutually incompatible languages - you can see a few on this list. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.explains why. You might want to check your work against what Koen wrote there, because all posts with "AI slop" are being moved into this thread.
In relation to the latter, it's not a good sign that your document says: "Using our grammar model, AI-generated Voynich-style sentences were produced and interpreted, such as:
- Generated: shokai pamel yotal okal chark dalsh kemar
- Interpreted: “Purify, apply to herb at the joint during the moon while boiling.”
By "Voynich-style", that sounds like you/Chat GPT mean Voynichese EVA? But while okal is recognizable EVA, "pamel" is not. This wouldn't be so much of a red flag except that your document then say pamel is used in folio 1r, 33v, 67r, and 88v. It's not. Has the AI hallucinated Voynichese text (yet again) and you didn't check it, or am I misunderstanding what you are doing here?
I fear I'm not misunderstanding, since your annex seems to mix real EVA words like shedy and daiin and qokain with "retchol", which I don't recognize.
