03-07-2025, 08:59 AM
A bit more on the initialisation problem as I see it.
Here, I am just talking about the very start of the text.
We must keep in mind that the text uses a new alphabet, and its words exhibit a relatively strict pattern.
Just starting with two arbitrary words (strings using some of the symbols in this alphabet) won't do it.
These would use only a subset of the character set, so the additional (new) characters would be introduced in an intial procedure. This should still be seen as part of the initialisation. This process is complete once all of the 'normal' characters are represented in the text.
Here I don't even want to make an issue of the more or less rare characters like x v b .
How large would this initial group have to be? Would this group already exhibit the word pattern?
This means that the word pattern would be included both in the initial words and in the rules for creating new ones. This would make it something deliberate.
Would it already include the bigram ed ?
If the MS really starts with f1r, then it would not.
What would the initialisation look like if You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is indeed the start?
Does any page in the MS exhibit a text that more strongly suggests such a start?
Here, I am just talking about the very start of the text.
We must keep in mind that the text uses a new alphabet, and its words exhibit a relatively strict pattern.
Just starting with two arbitrary words (strings using some of the symbols in this alphabet) won't do it.
These would use only a subset of the character set, so the additional (new) characters would be introduced in an intial procedure. This should still be seen as part of the initialisation. This process is complete once all of the 'normal' characters are represented in the text.
Here I don't even want to make an issue of the more or less rare characters like x v b .
How large would this initial group have to be? Would this group already exhibit the word pattern?
This means that the word pattern would be included both in the initial words and in the rules for creating new ones. This would make it something deliberate.
Would it already include the bigram ed ?
If the MS really starts with f1r, then it would not.
What would the initialisation look like if You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is indeed the start?
Does any page in the MS exhibit a text that more strongly suggests such a start?