29-05-2025, 05:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 29-05-2025, 05:49 PM by RobGea.
Edit Reason: text edit,typo
)
Seems to me this whole medieval astrology thing was hella complex.
Found this Masters thesis from 2013 by Irene Meekes - van Toer "Practical Advice in a Late-Fifteenth-Century Astrological Calendar Manuscript. Amsterdam UB MS XXIII A 8."
about a manuscipt in the Amsterdam University Special Collections Library.
The codex Amsterdam UB MS XXIII A 8 basically consists of a twelve-month calendar dating from about the last quarter of the fifteenth century.(1475-1500 AD)
The thesis itself is choc-a-bloc with medieval goodness and imho worth a read just for that.
I cannot find how the Zodiac signs were specifically dated but she does say this.
Found this Masters thesis from 2013 by Irene Meekes - van Toer "Practical Advice in a Late-Fifteenth-Century Astrological Calendar Manuscript. Amsterdam UB MS XXIII A 8."
about a manuscipt in the Amsterdam University Special Collections Library.
The codex Amsterdam UB MS XXIII A 8 basically consists of a twelve-month calendar dating from about the last quarter of the fifteenth century.(1475-1500 AD)
The thesis itself is choc-a-bloc with medieval goodness and imho worth a read just for that.
I cannot find how the Zodiac signs were specifically dated but she does say this.
Quote:Tradition dictates that the transition from one sign to another take place in the middle of each month.Thesis is in English. Link to its description (Msc link on that page) -> You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
This is reflected in our calendar,
where we find the Latin formulation "Sol in [aquario etc.]"
written in the margin of each calendar month.
The rules for each sign are thus valid for a month at a time.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)