Switch System

[dashstofsk]

In the below word there are not many repeating shapes and it certainly would not pass CLS scoring.
The key points of the word are "cho", this "o" tells me anything curve based can not be next, it can't repeat (this is opposite to CLS).
The next glyph used is "k", which is made from a line, finishing in a curve. "choko" this next "o" tells me the same thing, we can't have a curve next.
"i" ("chokoi") is next, I probably need to tweak my system a bit as "sh" is next and is valid but actually what I would expect to see is "ish" to match the shape of "i", its interesting this has a correction of some sort, I wonder if they did "sh" then realised it should be "ish", anyway.. that ends in a curve so the next glyph must be a switch/modifier or a curve. They choose "e" "chokoishe". If the last letter was not "e" but "o,a,y" we would know the next thing can't be a curve and using the preferences of each we could make a good guess on what letter it might be.

This appears to me to be too complicated. When I look at the manuscript I get the impression that the writing generally has an effortless flow to it, that the author doesn't pause mid-word to think about what should come next. Unique words like  chokoiShe  are always going to be something of a problem for us to explain, and especially this one given that it also contains the rare character pair  iSh.

It is my belief that people are thinking too hard about the manuscript. A simple solution is probably more likely. The author isn't an automaton. The writing isn't always going to follow a fixed formal standard. Mistakes, irregularities, oddities are to be expected. The writing probably does exhibit a lot of the author's writing style, and personal preferences will show. We just need to look for them.