19-03-2025, 05:49 PM
(19-03-2025, 05:35 PM)Bluetoes101 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I get what you mean but if we delete bits of any other "k" this scribe does we couldn't make this glyph
We would be left with |-| for the bottom half and need (-\ to match this, the pen strokes seem very different. If anything, if it is just "k", it looks like it started out as "a" then got corrected into a "k" to me
Edit: I'd also note that the scribes "k" tends to lean right, or if not be fairly upright. This would be the only one leaning left.
To me it does look like a very normal EVA-k with a few missing bits.
Regarding the shapes, look what happened to the final EVA-y in the fourth image, which you didn't mark as unusual. This probably is a EVA-y, but it has a very weird curve in its descender. Looks like the scribe had problems fitting the letters inside this ring.

