|
q as waw?
|
 Member details
Posts: 10,551 Threads: 432 Thanks Received: 4,959 in 2,819 posts Thanks Given: 4889 Joined: Mar 2016 Reputation: 11 Country: 
26-09-2016, 09:27 PM
So would "o" be one type of article then, and 4o the other? This would explain de distribution as well as the fact that 4o is rare in labels. It is conceivable that some articles used in full text are not used for single words. Or are you thinking about a different type of words?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
q as waw? - by Emma May Smith - 25-09-2016, 02:52 AM
RE: q as waw? - by ThomasCoon - 25-09-2016, 07:46 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Emma May Smith - 25-09-2016, 08:06 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Koen G - 25-09-2016, 08:18 PM
RE: q as waw? - by ThomasCoon - 25-09-2016, 09:38 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Emma May Smith - 25-09-2016, 09:45 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Koen G - 25-09-2016, 09:42 PM
RE: q as waw? - by -JKP- - 25-09-2016, 11:26 PM
RE: q as waw? - by ThomasCoon - 26-09-2016, 03:31 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Koen G - 26-09-2016, 03:37 PM
RE: q as waw? - by ThomasCoon - 26-09-2016, 09:11 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Koen G - 26-09-2016, 09:27 PM
RE: q as waw? - by -JKP- - 27-09-2016, 12:40 AM
RE: q as waw? - by Sam G - 27-09-2016, 09:13 AM
RE: q as waw? - by Koen G - 29-09-2016, 03:27 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Ruby Novacna - 29-09-2016, 08:18 PM
RE: q as waw? - by MarcoP - 30-09-2016, 09:22 AM
RE: q as waw? - by Koen G - 29-09-2016, 09:36 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Ruby Novacna - 30-09-2016, 04:01 PM
RE: q as waw? - by MarcoP - 30-09-2016, 05:11 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Ruby Novacna - 30-09-2016, 05:39 PM
RE: q as waw? - by MarcoP - 24-10-2016, 04:32 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Emma May Smith - 24-10-2016, 07:01 PM
RE: q as waw? - by MarcoP - 25-10-2016, 08:08 AM
RE: q as waw? - by MarcoP - 26-10-2016, 03:39 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Helmut Winkler - 26-10-2016, 05:42 PM
RE: q as waw? - by -JKP- - 28-10-2016, 12:19 AM
RE: q as waw? - by Ruby Novacna - 06-02-2017, 04:33 PM
|
