|
q as waw?
|
 Member details
Posts: 10,551 Threads: 432 Thanks Received: 4,959 in 2,819 posts Thanks Given: 4890 Joined: Mar 2016 Reputation: 11 Country: 
26-09-2016, 03:37 PM
Thomas - In that case I would argue that the "o" in itself is an article or something similar. In that case the surface appearance of "4o" as a meaningful unit would just be the result of "and" and an article being stuck to the beginning of words. I guess this ties in to the "gallows mark nouns" hypothesis.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
q as waw? - by Emma May Smith - 25-09-2016, 02:52 AM
RE: q as waw? - by ThomasCoon - 25-09-2016, 07:46 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Emma May Smith - 25-09-2016, 08:06 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Koen G - 25-09-2016, 08:18 PM
RE: q as waw? - by ThomasCoon - 25-09-2016, 09:38 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Emma May Smith - 25-09-2016, 09:45 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Koen G - 25-09-2016, 09:42 PM
RE: q as waw? - by -JKP- - 25-09-2016, 11:26 PM
RE: q as waw? - by ThomasCoon - 26-09-2016, 03:31 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Koen G - 26-09-2016, 03:37 PM
RE: q as waw? - by ThomasCoon - 26-09-2016, 09:11 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Koen G - 26-09-2016, 09:27 PM
RE: q as waw? - by -JKP- - 27-09-2016, 12:40 AM
RE: q as waw? - by Sam G - 27-09-2016, 09:13 AM
RE: q as waw? - by Koen G - 29-09-2016, 03:27 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Ruby Novacna - 29-09-2016, 08:18 PM
RE: q as waw? - by MarcoP - 30-09-2016, 09:22 AM
RE: q as waw? - by Koen G - 29-09-2016, 09:36 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Ruby Novacna - 30-09-2016, 04:01 PM
RE: q as waw? - by MarcoP - 30-09-2016, 05:11 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Ruby Novacna - 30-09-2016, 05:39 PM
RE: q as waw? - by MarcoP - 24-10-2016, 04:32 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Emma May Smith - 24-10-2016, 07:01 PM
RE: q as waw? - by MarcoP - 25-10-2016, 08:08 AM
RE: q as waw? - by MarcoP - 26-10-2016, 03:39 PM
RE: q as waw? - by Helmut Winkler - 26-10-2016, 05:42 PM
RE: q as waw? - by -JKP- - 28-10-2016, 12:19 AM
RE: q as waw? - by Ruby Novacna - 06-02-2017, 04:33 PM
|
