Double language in ancient manuscripts

[bi3mw]

This Alchemy is unique, because does not comply with the known symbolism for alchemy of middle ages.

Alchemical symbolism is one of those things. As far as I know, certain “standards” of representation only gradually became established. For me, it is only in writings from the end of the 15th century onwards that I can recognize a symbolism on the basis of which processes can really be described consistently. Before that, apart from individual elements, each work is more or less individual. It can therefore be concluded that there was no single alchemical symbolism for the entire Middle Ages and that a “standardized” representation is more likely to be found on the threshold of the early modern period.