02-02-2025, 12:05 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-02-2025, 01:24 AM by Bluetoes101.)
I think it will be better to just release it once done, otherwise I'm just explaining stuff that might change 
But basically yes, nothing is forced to end atm though other than 1 camp, which would be "i, n, m".
The absolute basics.
Take CLS rules;
Change "a" to "a,o,y" (switch)
Change "l" (line) to "K" (line-curve)
Add "l" back and only assign "i, n, m".
Words now die with "l" but not "k".
The idea is that we now bounce around text, like a language. It is not all "cccalll" for my system but more "akcakall"
So a very basic example.
"oral"
CLS
"clal"
This breaks CLS rules at "cl" and "la"
My system
">k>k"
">" "switch" from nothing can't fail as we didn't switch from anything on the page.
The system comes into play with "k>k".
"k" represents "\+c" Line-Curve. We then "switch" from "c". At this point (by my systems logic) there was never any choice to use a curve based glyph next because we switched away from a curve.
Hopefully this clarifies why I chose the word "switch". Lights on, lights off, there's no press it and lights on to on or off to off.
If the person writing wanted to write another letter on the end, no line based glyph is allowed. As "k" starts with a line it is included, not just "i,n,m".
"k" is my group that can move to 2 places as I mentioned before, but it depends how you want to look at it. In a diagram it can now choose "c" or ">", in another way of thinking (the one I pref) because it ends with "c" it has been teleported to "c" already and continues on its available path, more c's or switch, once it switches it can interact with lines again.
***Subject to change, T&Cs apply!!!
The constraining of the idea is taking for more time than the idea itself. I hope this clarifies the process though.
But basically yes, nothing is forced to end atm though other than 1 camp, which would be "i, n, m".
The absolute basics.
Take CLS rules;
Change "a" to "a,o,y" (switch)
Change "l" (line) to "K" (line-curve)
Add "l" back and only assign "i, n, m".
Words now die with "l" but not "k".
The idea is that we now bounce around text, like a language. It is not all "cccalll" for my system but more "akcakall"
So a very basic example.
"oral"
CLS
"clal"
This breaks CLS rules at "cl" and "la"
My system
">k>k"
">" "switch" from nothing can't fail as we didn't switch from anything on the page.
The system comes into play with "k>k".
"k" represents "\+c" Line-Curve. We then "switch" from "c". At this point (by my systems logic) there was never any choice to use a curve based glyph next because we switched away from a curve.
Hopefully this clarifies why I chose the word "switch". Lights on, lights off, there's no press it and lights on to on or off to off.
If the person writing wanted to write another letter on the end, no line based glyph is allowed. As "k" starts with a line it is included, not just "i,n,m".
"k" is my group that can move to 2 places as I mentioned before, but it depends how you want to look at it. In a diagram it can now choose "c" or ">", in another way of thinking (the one I pref) because it ends with "c" it has been teleported to "c" already and continues on its available path, more c's or switch, once it switches it can interact with lines again.
***Subject to change, T&Cs apply!!!
The constraining of the idea is taking for more time than the idea itself. I hope this clarifies the process though.