Curve-Line System - Bluetoes edition
#24
(29-01-2025, 03:48 PM)Bluetoes101 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Yeah I think it might be too simple. I could probably fit it on a couple of napkins in a bar. I guess we will see what happens. 

Simple is not bad, to me simple is actually better both at the metrics and in explanatory capacity. Also, I doubt that a 240+ page manuscript was created using a complex system with many processing steps. It is possible, but would require a separate explanation. To me it seems more likely that the underlying principle is quite simple.

(29-01-2025, 03:48 PM)Bluetoes101 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I worry a little about making it score better for the sake of it, but I should probably think about stuff like "how many possible glyph sequences of length 3 can either system produce?" - As well as the other information and ideas you have given me, so thank you for taking the time to explain and giving me a look at what may await.

I don't know if it makes sense to introduce changes that would improve the score if they go against the logic of the system. I'm certainly not arguing for that. I'm just curious to what extent your version of CLS represents an improvement over the original CLS according to some well defined metric. I think, coverage alone (comparing the number of conforming words) is probably not a good indicator without additional way to account for the predictive power of the system.
[+] 1 user says Thank You to oshfdk for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Curve-Line System - Bluetoes edition - by oshfdk - 29-01-2025, 05:44 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: