(27-01-2025, 08:38 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(27-01-2025, 12:18 AM)Bluetoes101 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm not sure why this took me this long to notice, but I think there is a good case (if you think CLS has any merit) that EVA: L, is the line equivalent of EVA: Y.
I agree.
I think that this was also already pointed out in Brian Cham's original document (possibly co-authored with David Jackson): You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
What it may lead us to is another question.
Thank you for the link, I tried to find this article earlier today and couldn't remember the authors' names or the title.
Now I see that they actually highlighted the possibility that l is the minim version of y in the introduction below.

