14-01-2025, 11:23 AM
(This post was last modified: 14-01-2025, 11:24 AM by Bluetoes101.)
Thanks Oshfdk,
Personally I think more is better Vessy, after all it does seem to have settled an old debate on what people saw in the paint - Words, eyes, 2 clasps were a few. Plus I am a bit sceptical at taking the paint at face value, there's a good chance anything between red and blue could end up blue, and anything between red and yellow could end up yellow.. and much more on pages where they had restricted colours for whatever reason. So it could be telling a lot, or influencing a lot in the wrong direction. Not to mention it could have been added later by someone who also couldn't read the manuscript and we are taking their interpretation as the original artists. I guess we aren't left with much choice but to hope for accurate clues on some cases though, such as a block..
Personally I think more is better Vessy, after all it does seem to have settled an old debate on what people saw in the paint - Words, eyes, 2 clasps were a few. Plus I am a bit sceptical at taking the paint at face value, there's a good chance anything between red and blue could end up blue, and anything between red and yellow could end up yellow.. and much more on pages where they had restricted colours for whatever reason. So it could be telling a lot, or influencing a lot in the wrong direction. Not to mention it could have been added later by someone who also couldn't read the manuscript and we are taking their interpretation as the original artists. I guess we aren't left with much choice but to hope for accurate clues on some cases though, such as a block..