15-12-2024, 06:49 AM
Thank you for your interest in my post. I am a non specialist, but have participated in the Dyatlov Pass Incident forum for quite some time. From that experience, I have developed an idea that when one can not answer the "why" of a question, then it may be more fruitful to address the "how" of it.
In the case of the VM, how could the document be written without any corrections? How could otherwise unknown plants be illustrated? The answer is that the text was slowly and tediously constructed using a template and nonsensical characters. The botanical artwork reduces to variations of the basic plant. For example, I can make the stem on this drawing longer and I'll make the flowers rounder etc. On my next drawing, I'll just so something I have not done before. Nobody can find these plants because they do not exist. As an added benefit, nobody can even figure out the name of the plant because of the way I constructed the words.
When the best human minds and our computer intelligence can not figure out what one or two people did by candlelight a few hundred years back, they may be missing the point. Cobbling together a mystical book beats farming.
In the case of the VM, how could the document be written without any corrections? How could otherwise unknown plants be illustrated? The answer is that the text was slowly and tediously constructed using a template and nonsensical characters. The botanical artwork reduces to variations of the basic plant. For example, I can make the stem on this drawing longer and I'll make the flowers rounder etc. On my next drawing, I'll just so something I have not done before. Nobody can find these plants because they do not exist. As an added benefit, nobody can even figure out the name of the plant because of the way I constructed the words.
When the best human minds and our computer intelligence can not figure out what one or two people did by candlelight a few hundred years back, they may be missing the point. Cobbling together a mystical book beats farming.