19-09-2016, 08:15 PM
So... Is there a problem here? Is this too simplistic? Where's the difficulty? Take the first two examples which are quite comparable. [4 x 17 Symbol Sequence of VMs f57v]
Symbol 5 has an alphabetic or numerical interpretation according to its use in the relevant system. Either interpretation is supported by the interpretation of a second symbol from that same relevant sequence . And it is further located in the VMs sequence at the same distance of separation as it is found in the relevant traditional symbol sequence - either Greek alphabet or medieval numerals.
Does it seem possible that this could be something accidental and unintentional? Could the person responsible for the origination of this construction have written what we see without knowing these various interpretations to start with? I think not. The construction is too complex to be accidental.
So here is a demonstration of traditional interpretations of VMs symbols that were presented in the text, with the interpretation verified by objective, positional evidence in the VMs text and no one cares to comment. Does someone disagree?
Does anyone have suggestions as to how this information might be useful? After all, we have a bit of an alphabetic sequence and also a bit of a numeric sequence. Can these sequences be extended? Might these sequences correspond to the wheels on a cipher disk? I've not had any luck with that.
What is the significance of 'five' inverted in the fifth position? What is the sixth symbol in the VMs 4 x 17 symbol sequence? A traditional interpretation might call Symbol 6 a quincunx. And, among other things, in astrology it represents a connection to the fifth house of the zodiac from the primary house. So what happens if we go to the VMs Zodiac and look at the first five houses? Another medieval puzzle, a challenge to historical recognition.
Symbol 5 has an alphabetic or numerical interpretation according to its use in the relevant system. Either interpretation is supported by the interpretation of a second symbol from that same relevant sequence . And it is further located in the VMs sequence at the same distance of separation as it is found in the relevant traditional symbol sequence - either Greek alphabet or medieval numerals.
Does it seem possible that this could be something accidental and unintentional? Could the person responsible for the origination of this construction have written what we see without knowing these various interpretations to start with? I think not. The construction is too complex to be accidental.
So here is a demonstration of traditional interpretations of VMs symbols that were presented in the text, with the interpretation verified by objective, positional evidence in the VMs text and no one cares to comment. Does someone disagree?
Does anyone have suggestions as to how this information might be useful? After all, we have a bit of an alphabetic sequence and also a bit of a numeric sequence. Can these sequences be extended? Might these sequences correspond to the wheels on a cipher disk? I've not had any luck with that.
What is the significance of 'five' inverted in the fifth position? What is the sixth symbol in the VMs 4 x 17 symbol sequence? A traditional interpretation might call Symbol 6 a quincunx. And, among other things, in astrology it represents a connection to the fifth house of the zodiac from the primary house. So what happens if we go to the VMs Zodiac and look at the first five houses? Another medieval puzzle, a challenge to historical recognition.