10-12-2024, 04:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-12-2024, 04:56 PM by Mark Knowles.)
(10-12-2024, 04:04 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Did you notice that on the Rosettes, the order is object-scallops-rays and not object-rays-scallops? Just like in the luminous cloud picture I posted.
And so what do you conclude from that? Are you suggesting that this is different on the maps? The hashing maps the external and water boundary just as on the maps. The "rays" on your illustration cover the "scallops" whereas in the Rosettes folio the "hashing", as I say it is, is next to the "waves", as I describe them, not covering them.
Mathematically there is no way to prove which images are more similar or calculate the extent of similarities, but in my opinion the waves interpretation is clearly the better one. Then this could be confirmation bias on my part or confirmation bias on your part or confirmation bias on both of our parts. That we both like all other researchers suffer from some degree of confirmation bias is the most likely scenario.
Still, the cumulative evidence that the page is some kind of map is nevertheless very strong in my opinion having studied the page in minute detail.

