Rosettes and Revelations Pt.1: The Holy City - Koen Gheuens and Cary Rapaport
#77
On the subject of confirmation bias. It is certainly an ever present risk what we should all try and be cognisant of. Whatever our theory we all probably suffer from a degree of confirmation bias.

As far as other biases go on a personal level I can say that
I am not Milanese or Swiss and I have no personal reasons why I have a preference for this theory. I am not related to the Barbavara family. In fact I rather prefer a more exotic map location than Central Europe. I like the idea that it could represent Georgia or Armenia. I have arrived at this idea as I find it the most plausible explanation that I can find or think of. If I could think of a better explanation then I would happily dump this theory and move to a better theory.
Certainly, if I found out that my explanation was completely wrong then I would find it dispiriting. Do I expect some things to be wrong? Yes, as it is such a detailed theory it seems inconceivable that is all correct. Some details are surely wrong.

I greatly enjoy mysteries whether detective or other and the Voynich manuscript is a great mystery. And I really want to know the truth of the manuscript including this page specifically. So, a desire for the truth whatever it is whether mine or someone else's, is important to me.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Rosettes and Revelations Pt.1: The Holy City - Koen Gheuens and Cary Rapaport - by Mark Knowles - 24-11-2024, 05:48 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)