Rosettes and Revelations Pt.1: The Holy City - Koen Gheuens and Cary Rapaport

[Mark Knowles]

Another issue is that the more details one forces into one's theory, the more entrenched this theory becomes.

If one argues that the more details one includes in one's analysis the more that one traps and confines a theory in one line of thought and therefore presumably the more details a theory covers the worse the theory then I feel that is a problematic line of thought.

I feel that one could argue that the least detailed a theory is the better it is. Certainly the less detail it has the less that can be mistaken or wrong within it. A null-theory which explains nothing can't be wrong.