[Book] New book

[BessAgritianin]

I notice, and others may have notice by now, when I counter one of your arguments, rather than refute me, you move on to another item, rather than explaining why my answer was wrong. As you did with your claim that everyone agreed, since 1945... and now, the "genius" point I made. But your answer here, about what document was copied to make this forgery... I did actually answer you: Yes, there is a specific definition of the word "forgery", which usually entails an "original" to be copied from. As I pointed out, the Voynich (as my hypothesis describes it) arguably does fulfill "forgery" to some extent, as items and styles are loosely copied from other works. 

But another thing about your complaint here: You bring up the fact that it does not look like a copy of anything which came before, and therefore cannot be considered a "forgery". 

So, no, you are correct, the Voynich, if fake, may not technically be a forgery; but its uniqueness implies forgery.

I see in this the old "bugaboo" of definition........
.........................................................................................................
Rich.

* Just speculation, as all of it necessarily is, but "IF" the Voynich has meaning I think the plain text will relate to activities, items and people in the early 17th century Court of Rudolf II, as (poorly) understood by the 1904 book, "Follies of Science in the Court of Rudolf II". Your mileage may vary.

Hello Rich, by all my respect to You and Your work, which I read two times, I cannot agree with your statement about VM being a forgery. And I will remain in this belief, whatever comes in times being.
White noise in Your answer is not providing proofs about the forgery-  original script and original Language.
Let us assume, that I have some more information from the text and I have the proof of an ancient text peeking out from the script. How do I make known these crumbles of truth, without being stolen from the sales geniuses? How do I make the people believe, after thousands of claims of cracking the code or that the manuscript being fake? How do I do it?