07-10-2024, 06:29 PM
The use of the word "paper" is simply a clue to fact that the author has taken no account of the contents of the VMs in his discussion of the manuscript's authenticity and modern provenance.
So, what do the contents have to say on the matter of modern forgery? C-14 dates the parchment. The written text is impenetrable, and the artistry reveals more and more that there is an innate familiarity with social information that is most compatible with the first half of the 15th century. The most probable way for a person to have gained that level of familiarity would be to have lived during that era.
It's not forgery. It's trickery. The VMs is a puzzle. Visual discrepancy is part of the disguise. This can be seen in the VMs cosmos, mermaid, etc. It can be proven by the duality on VMs White Aries. Trickery is intentional.
So, what do the contents have to say on the matter of modern forgery? C-14 dates the parchment. The written text is impenetrable, and the artistry reveals more and more that there is an innate familiarity with social information that is most compatible with the first half of the 15th century. The most probable way for a person to have gained that level of familiarity would be to have lived during that era.
It's not forgery. It's trickery. The VMs is a puzzle. Visual discrepancy is part of the disguise. This can be seen in the VMs cosmos, mermaid, etc. It can be proven by the duality on VMs White Aries. Trickery is intentional.