[Book] New book

[nablator]

Perhaps he has presented some additional evidence beyond what SantaColomo has presented in his blogs and posts but his obviously ill-informed and biased position that is apparent from his preface makes me doubt the value of the book.

No there isn't any new evidence or discussion of existing evidence, just blanket denial that there is any evidence of provenance before 1912:

The provenance before 1912 is purely speculative (or fake) and undocumented for lack of evidence.

I've read it (skipped many chapters about historical background, various irrelevant hoaxes and biographical information that fill 99% of the book) and found no argument: Voynich did it, period.