01-09-2024, 12:55 AM
I'm working on several larger posts.. slowly, but I thought I'd fish out one of the images to share on this post as it seems useful.
Forth line down, first word is the prime example of EVA:d for apparent formation of the glyph, but then there's all this variation. Maybe it is normal variation, I don't know, but the interesting bit (to me) is that if this is so, and the scribe and the glyph are consistent, EVA:d is made from a "c" and "l"
Red = Prime example. White = Related to red. Purple = Less obvious
![[Image: 7Nf4LcI.png]](https://i.imgur.com/7Nf4LcI.png)
Forth line down, first word is the prime example of EVA:d for apparent formation of the glyph, but then there's all this variation. Maybe it is normal variation, I don't know, but the interesting bit (to me) is that if this is so, and the scribe and the glyph are consistent, EVA:d is made from a "c" and "l"
Red = Prime example. White = Related to red. Purple = Less obvious