05-05-2024, 05:39 AM
It occurred to me that single 'e' cannot be generated by this method, but from an example it appears that you also have a rule that 'ee' can be replaced by 'e' (and probably 'eee').
I do see a bit of a problem, stemming from an observation by Massimiliano Zattera.
Your proposed method generates far more invalid words than valid words, and the ratio between the two is one of the metrics of the quality of such grammars.
I very much like these types of experiments though.
I do see a bit of a problem, stemming from an observation by Massimiliano Zattera.
Your proposed method generates far more invalid words than valid words, and the ratio between the two is one of the metrics of the quality of such grammars.
I very much like these types of experiments though.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)