I prepared a couple of presentations of the findings from this paper in a different form than shown in the paper or the supplemental online material.
They are both attached below.
One shows all of the tokens that were found to have a statistically significant propensity (affinitive or aversive) and how they compare across the five subject positions analyzed in the study.
The other shows all of the affinitive tokens arranged in a Venn diagram. This one is interesting as it highlights the fact that there are three mutually exclusive sets of tokens: those with affinity for the TOP position, for the FIRST and AFTER positions, and for the BEFORE and LAST positions. And it further shows that the latter two pairs of positions each share some tokens between them.
There are other interesting patterns seen in that Venn diagram as well.
I am leaving the proposed interpretations and implications of all this for a future publication, but would be interested to hear any thoughts from you all on what it all means.
They are both attached below.
One shows all of the tokens that were found to have a statistically significant propensity (affinitive or aversive) and how they compare across the five subject positions analyzed in the study.
The other shows all of the affinitive tokens arranged in a Venn diagram. This one is interesting as it highlights the fact that there are three mutually exclusive sets of tokens: those with affinity for the TOP position, for the FIRST and AFTER positions, and for the BEFORE and LAST positions. And it further shows that the latter two pairs of positions each share some tokens between them.
There are other interesting patterns seen in that Venn diagram as well.
I am leaving the proposed interpretations and implications of all this for a future publication, but would be interested to hear any thoughts from you all on what it all means.