Yale University Free Discussion on MS-408

[merrimacga]

That is 1411-1430 with 68.2% probability, but these numbers are less interesting, so probably not usually reported.

And the source for that is page 8 figure 7 of the radiocarbon dating report, which shows the mean of the 4 samples collected, 1 from each of folios 8, 26, 47, and 68, noting on page 3 that this only dates the vellum and not the writing:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

(Sources for the PDF: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. this site, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. report You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. Interestingly, the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. about it doesn't mention the dating ranges.)

The McCrone report on the inks doesn't date the writing either but rather only breaks down the contents of the inks based on 20 samples taken from 8 folios.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

(Source for the PDF: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. collections highlights page.)

Not that this is news to anyone here but I'm guessing sometimes it helps to re-post the source links.