31-10-2023, 04:02 PM
It's an interesting and well done talk. However, I am currently a bit over halfway through and I see a problem, which is that Currier languages are ignored. So he discovers a statistical shift around f33, which is where we also see a shift towards Herbal B. To me this feels kind of like discovering where a new 'language' starts, much more than a new topic or a new author. (Even though we do know Currier languages also correspond to different hands). The analysis should really have been done separated by Currier language, in my opinion.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)