A possible way to break down Voynich text
#23
Quote:Thank you - I was not even aware that <g> was a different letter than <m>. Alright, I'll have to look more at that situation. I'm not sure I agree with the EVA creators that they are different.

Graphically they are. This is best seen using the "base shape + tail modifier" approach. m results from i plus the tail modifier, while g results from e plus the same tail modifier.


Quote:I have seen these <chh> combinations and they may not affect my units - for example:

2. ySKcy= y/s/k/ey

5. ch cKhh y = ch / ek / ch / y

6. ch cKhhy = ch / ek / ch / y (same as 5)

For examples #3 - 6, this ignores the fact that the second e in a row is deliberately placed under the crossbar. Note that its top is not aligned with the crossbar. Furthermore, these "lower" e's are not corrections: note that the crossbar has been sufficiently extended rightwards so as to fit the "lower" e in.
[+] 1 user says Thank You to Anton for this post
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: A possible way to break down Voynich text - by Anton - 05-09-2016, 01:27 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)