(04-09-2016, 01:48 AM)ThomasCoon wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Well, I actually think that the spaces in text are completely fake. I think that he wrote large words (ex. "vocabulary") into two words: ("vocab-ulary").
...
It works the other way, as well. Word-tokens that appear to be unique can frequently be broken into two (or occasionally three) commonly used units which means that any attempt to ascribe special meanings to "unique" vords might be a misassumption for some or all of them.
(04-09-2016, 12:16 AM)ThomasCoon wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This is something that I've known for a while now, and I have kept it secret, but I think it's time to reveal it to the community.
...
Welcome to the club.

I agree in principle to this kind of breakdown (as I have also noted on Don's posts and briefly alluded to on a couple of blogs). I don't agree with 100% of your breakdowns but I don't think the deconstruction has to be perfect for it to be productive so I'm not going to niggle about small details.
And no, I'm not revealing mine to the community yet. There's this little problem of how to wrestle 2200+ pages of notes into something digestible (and of giving away too much before I've had a chance to write it up)!

